Recent discussions between U.S. leaders and UAE President Mohammed Bin Zayed have brought Sudan’s crisis into focus, shifting attention from more anticipated issues. Analyst Mohamed Hereika noted the U.S. designation of the UAE as a ‘major defense partner’ and emphasized the importance of dialogue to address the humanitarian challenges and restore civilian-led governance in Sudan.
In recent discussions between United States President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and United Arab Emirates (UAE) President Mohammed Bin Zayed, the focus was on the situation in Sudan rather than anticipated topics such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict or the Gaza crisis. Political analyst Mohamed Hereika expressed his astonishment regarding this shift in focus during an interview with Radio Dabanga. He highlighted the importance of the U.S. designating the UAE as a ‘major defense partner’ during these talks and noted the consensus reached on the need for a cessation of hostilities in Sudan and a restoration of civilian governance. Hereika further observed that despite tensions with certain factions of the Sudanese government towards the UAE, the UAE and the U.S. appear aligned in their approach to the Sudanese conflict. He remarked on the UAE’s ongoing efforts to address the humanitarian concerns, particularly regarding Sudanese refugees in Chad, as well as the notable discontent expressed by a refugee in a viral video, compelling the UAE to reconsider its alleged support for the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Addressing the claims of UAE support for the RSF, Hereika mentioned that international bodies have noted regional interference, although specific accusations against the UAE have not been substantiated. A report from the New York Times recently highlighted these allegations, yet Hereika expressed surprise that Sudan’s diplomatic ties with the UAE have not suffered in light of these accusations. He questioned the UAE’s capacity to act as a mediator in the Sudan crisis, particularly in the face of claims from the Sudanese Armed Forces that contributed to their withdrawal from recent Geneva talks. Hereika emphasized the necessity of dialogue, stating, ‘All wars eventually end at the negotiating table,’ and called for proactive political measures to avert further humanitarian devastation. Both the United States and the United Arab Emirates reaffirmed their commitment to a peaceful resolution in Sudan.
The discussions involving the United States and the United Arab Emirates regarding Sudan are rooted in a complex geopolitical landscape influenced by the ongoing Sudanese crisis. The situation in Sudan has entailed prolonged conflict involving various factions and, in particular, the paramilitary group RSF. The UAE and the U.S. have sought to stabilize the region, balancing both humanitarian efforts and diplomatic relations while facing challenges from different Sudanese political factions. This context is critical to understanding the motivations behind recent U.S.-UAE dialogues and their outcomes as they seek collaborative solutions to the Sudanese crisis.
In conclusion, the recent U.S.-UAE discussions have underscored the shifting focus towards Sudan amidst broader geopolitical challenges. Both nations appear united in their call for a peaceful resolution to the ongoing crisis, recognizing the urgent need for a cessation of violence and the restoration of governance led by civilians. These talks highlight the complexities surrounding the UAE’s involvement and its potential role in mediating within a fraught political landscape.
Original Source: www.dabangasudan.org
