The UAE has reiterated accusations against the Sudanese army for allegedly bombing its ambassador’s residence in Khartoum, prompting widespread condemnation from Gulf states and Egypt. The UAE’s Minister of State condemned the attack, whereas Sudan denied the allegations, defending its military actions as necessary for national security. Regional responses include strong denunciations from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Oman, Bahrain, and Egypt, emphasizing violations of international law and diplomatic protections.
On September 30, 2024, a diplomat from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) reiterated serious accusations against the Sudanese army concerning an alleged bombing of the UAE ambassador’s residence in Khartoum. This statement has elicited widespread denunciation from several Gulf states and Egypt. UAE Minister of State, Sheikh Shakhbut bin Nahyan, stated, “Our country condemns in the strongest terms the blatant attack launched by the Sudanese armed forces,” underscoring the UAE’s firm stance against the continued aggression against civilians in Sudan by warring factions. In response to these accusations, both the Sudanese foreign ministry and army spokesperson categorically denied the allegations, defending their operations as necessary measures to protect national security. They asserted that the military had the right to safeguard its territory. The situation prompted Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry to issue a statement condemning the purported attack as a breach of international law. Similarly, Jordan characterized the incident as a severe violation of international norms and the protections afforded to diplomatic premises under the Vienna Convention. Oman’s foreign ministry also condemned the event, branding it as a clear infringement of diplomatic principles. Bahrain expressed its firm denunciation, reinforcing its support for the UAE in this matter. Additionally, Jasem Mohamed Al-Budaiwi, the Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation Council, condemned the act as a “blatant attack.” Egypt’s foreign ministry voiced its concern regarding the escalating situation in Sudan, highlighting that assaults on diplomatic facilities are in direct violation of international law and specifically the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
The recent tensions between the UAE and Sudan stem from a broader conflict in Sudan involving various factions competing for power, which has led to significant civilian suffering and international concern. The allegations of an attack on the UAE embassy mark a significant diplomatic incident, highlighting the vulnerabilities of diplomatic missions in conflict zones and raising questions about the adherence to international laws designed to protect such facilities.
In summary, the UAE’s accusations against the Sudanese army concerning the alleged bombing of its ambassador’s residence have escalated diplomatic tensions in the region. The strong condemnation from multiple Gulf states and Egypt underscores the seriousness of the allegations and the broader implications for international diplomatic norms. This incident emphasizes the ongoing instability in Sudan and the need for adherence to international law in safeguarding diplomatic missions.
Original Source: sudantribune.com
