The Rapid Support Forces in Sudan have declared a ban on all exports to Egypt, citing alleged Egyptian interference and recent accusations of airstrikes against RSF positions. This decision signifies a drastic shift in relations between the neighboring countries, with potential implications for regional stability.
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan, led by Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo, commonly referred to as Hemedti, have instituted a ban on all exports from Sudan to Egypt, a decision announced on Saturday. This action is described as a consequence of Egypt’s alleged interference in Sudanese affairs, including accusations from Hemedti regarding Egyptian airstrikes targeting RSF positions, which the Egyptian Foreign Ministry has categorically denied. The ban is applicable in those territories of Sudan that are controlled by the RSF. Abu Shoutal, a prominent figure within the RSF operating in the Blue Nile region, issued a stern warning to traders, advising against any exportation of goods to Egypt. He stated that those who disobey would face severe repercussions. “If the merchants send even one unit of their products, they will be punished,” he declared, emphasizing, “Our exports should be sent to all of our neighbors, except for Egypt. Any truck headed to Egypt through the al-Dabba crossing should be dealt with as an enemy.” Sudanese goods that would typically be exported to Egypt encompass various agricultural and animal products, including peanuts, corn, sesame, gum Arabic, camels, and cattle, primarily sourced from RSF-administered regions such as Darfur and Kordofan. The RSF maintains control over areas that border Egypt and through which exports would be transported. Experts indicate that this ban marks a pivotal change in the relationship between Sudan and Egypt, with Rasha Awad, a journalist and civil activist, asserting that the ban could have perilous ramifications and heighten the potential for a direct confrontation between the RSF and Egypt. She elaborated on the implications, suggesting that this situation could escalate the existing conflict in Sudan into a broader regional war, potentially involving Ethiopia. Awad also raised a critical question regarding the viability of the RSF’s intentions: “Who will buy the banned products and is there a safe alternative to the Egyptian markets?” Furthermore, she speculated whether this ban could be leveraged as a justification for intensifying the conflict within Sudan, indicating that the forthcoming days would provide clarity. Analyst Mohammed Latif noted that the dynamics between Sudan and Egypt would be irrevocably altered following this ban. Meanwhile, supporters of the RSF circulated videos which purportedly depict trucks laden with goods and livestock that have been denied passage at the Egyptian border, despite Hemedti’s orders prohibiting the dissemination of imagery involving his forces.
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan, under Hemedti’s command, wield considerable influence, operating primarily in regions characterized by agricultural abundance. Historically, Sudan has engaged in trade with Egypt, exporting significant quantities of agricultural produce and live animals. The recent tensions underscore the fragile nature of Sudanese-Egyptian relations, particularly in the context of regional security and territorial integrity.
The announcement by the RSF to prohibit exports to Egypt symbolizes a significant escalation in diplomatic tensions between the two countries. With its operational control over key export regions, the RSF’s ban threatens to disrupt longstanding economic ties and poses potential risks of regional conflict. Should this situation continue to escalate, it may require close attention from international observers and regional stakeholders.
Original Source: english.aawsat.com
