South Sudan has implemented a temporary ban on social media platforms in light of recent unrest related to violence in neighboring Sudan. The National Communication Authority ordered internet service providers to block access for a minimum of 30 days. Journalists are using VPNs to maintain communication, although concerns over audience reach persist as government officials hint at a potential lifting of the ban soon.
In response to ongoing unrest, South Sudan has imposed a ban on social media platforms, directing all internet service providers to block access for an initial period of 30 days, with a potential extension up to 90 days. This measure, announced by the National Communication Authority, aims to halt the dissemination of videos depicting violent incidents that resulted in protests and retaliation against Sudanese nationals in South Sudan.
The authorities enforced a curfew in Juba following violent protests linked to events in Sudan. Telecom providers Zain South Sudan and MTN South Sudan confirmed the restriction, informing users that platforms like TikTok and Facebook were no longer available without a VPN. Journalists have expressed concerns regarding their ability to reach audiences under these conditions.
On January 23, a representative from the National Communication Authority mentioned a possibility of uplifting the social media ban within 72 hours. However, inquiries directed to South Sudan’s information minister went unanswered, leaving uncertainties regarding future access to social media for the citizens.
South Sudan has encountered a wave of unrest linked to disturbing events occurring in neighboring Sudan. Following the killings of South Sudanese individuals, protests erupted, leading to violent incidents within South Sudan. The government’s directive to suspend social media access is a tactic employed to mitigate the spread of information and curb potential further unrest. This decision has evoked concerns surrounding freedom of expression and the importance of credible news sources during turbulent times.
The South Sudanese government’s decision to block social media access reflects a broader concern regarding public unrest and is perceived as an attempt to control the flow of information. As journalists and human rights advocates struggle to communicate amid this environment, the implications for free speech and civil liberties are significant. The possibility of lifting the ban remains uncertain, highlighting the delicate balance between governance and public access to information.
Original Source: news.az
