The Tagaddum coalition in Sudan has officially split over differing views on forming a parallel government, signaling deepening divisions amid ongoing conflicts between the army and RSF. This separation allows each faction to pursue distinct strategies for peace and governance. The Sudanese government has proposed a new roadmap for post-conflict recovery, emphasizing the need for dialogue and ceasefire conditions.
Sudan’s principal civilian coalition, Tagaddum, officially announced a division on Monday, resulting from divergent perspectives regarding the establishment of a parallel government. This separation underscores the increasing tensions within the coalition amid ongoing strife between the national army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia.
The split follows Deputy Chairperson al-Hadi Idris’s advocacy for a civilian government aimed at challenging the authority of the administration appointed by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. In light of the differences, Tagaddum convened under the leadership of former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok and confirmed the need for a formal fracture.
A statement from Tagaddum indicated, “The most appropriate option is to separate those holding the two positions, so that each can work under a separate political and organizational platform with two new and different names.” Consequently, each faction is set to pursue its unique strategy to end the ongoing conflict, establish peace, and foster democratic governance.
While specific groups opposing the parallel government were not named, Tagaddum indicated that they constitute the majority within the coalition. Supporters of the parallel government initiative include prominent figures such as al-Hadi Idris and members of the Sovereignty Council, along with Suleiman Sandal, who leads a faction of the Justice and Equality Movement.
Tagaddum, which encompasses a variety of political parties, armed factions, and independent stakeholders, is recognized as one of Sudan’s largest civilian political alliances. Tensions within the coalition have been escalating, particularly after the appointment of a committee to navigate the disputes over government formation in territories controlled by the RSF.
A recent government announcement introduced a post-conflict roadmap that involves establishing a technocratic government, appointing a civilian prime minister, and initiating national dialogue. This plan, outlined by the Sudanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, stipulates the need for disarmament and the lifting of the RSF’s siege of El Fasher before any formal ceasefire or negotiations can commence.
The recent fracture within Sudan’s Tagaddum coalition highlights increasing divides regarding governance in the context of ongoing military conflicts. Supporters of a parallel government, led by key figures, aim to redefine Sudan’s political landscape amid significant challenges. The government’s newly introduced roadmap outlines essential steps for post-conflict recovery, underscoring the critical need for dialogue and strategic negotiation among factions.
Original Source: www.dailynewsegypt.com
