The European Parliament has called for the suspension of the minerals agreement with Rwanda amidst escalating conflict in DRC, citing severe human rights violations. Despite these concerns, the EU plans to continue purchasing minerals, with Commissioner Šuica highlighting the importance of adhering to human rights commitments. MEPs demand Rwanda sever ties with M23 rebels, condemning violence in the region.
The European Parliament has called for the suspension of the vital minerals agreement with Rwanda due to the escalating military conflict in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). This violence, particularly in Goma, fueled by M23 rebels allegedly backed by Rwandan forces, raises concerns about the agreement’s integrity. Despite this, EU Commissioner Dubravka Šuica emphasized that the EU’s commitment to purchasing metals and rare earths would continue, arguing that halting the agreement could undermine human rights obligations.
In a recent resolution adopted with significant support, MEPs condemned the occupation of territories in eastern DRC by M23 rebels and Rwandan forces. They pointed to serious human rights violations, including indiscriminate attacks and war crimes in the region, leading to a reported death toll of over 3,000. The Parliament asserted the need for immediate action to cease Rwanda’s interference in the DRC, awaiting the cessation of exports from M23-controlled areas.
The EU has increased its relations with Rwanda, providing financial aid and military support to their troops. MEPs urge a halt to these measures until Rwanda severs ties with M23. The Parliament denounced the EU-Rwanda Memorandum, signed only a year ago, which aims to secure critical minerals for the European market, describing the sourced minerals as “bloodstained.”
This agreement is part of the EU’s global strategy to lessen its dependence on China for essential materials required for ecological transition. It is designed to ensure a sustainable supply of raw materials in exchange for significant investments in Rwanda’s mining infrastructure. However, the deal has sparked controversy due to the acknowledged illicit trade in conflict zone minerals, leading the DRC’s president to label it a “provocation in very bad taste.”
Currently, the European Commission remains non-committal on altering the memorandum. Commissioner Šuica, representing EU foreign affairs, reiterated calls for both parties to maintain open borders for humanitarian aid and protect civilians. Additionally, she confirmed that the Commission is accelerating funding for humanitarian efforts in the DRC amid ongoing conflict, while dismissing allegations regarding mineral sourcing.
Šuica asserted that suspending the memorandum could be counterproductive, suggesting that it would eliminate incentives for responsible trade practices in Rwanda. The EU aims to ensure safe working conditions and combat child labor within its support framework, emphasizing that the EU’s commitments remain focused on protecting rights and adhering to humanitarian law.
In summary, the European Parliament urges a reevaluation of the minerals agreement with Rwanda due to conflicts affecting DRC, while emphasizing the importance of human rights obligations. A strong resolution condemns the violence in Eastern Congo and holds Rwanda responsible for supporting M23 rebels. The European Commission’s commitment to purchasing minerals persists, even as MEPs demand immediate action and accountability from Rwanda. The overall stance highlights the complicated balance between securing mineral supplies and addressing human rights violations, pointing to a need for humanitarian considerations in ongoing negotiations.
Original Source: www.eunews.it
