Kenya faced diplomatic backlash following its support for a charter signed by the RSF to establish a parallel government in Sudan. Saudi Arabia and Qatar condemned this initiative, emphasizing the importance of Sudan’s unity and urging adherence to existing agreements. The RSF aims to govern in rebel-held areas, advocating for a secular and democratic state.
Kenya’s diplomatic relationship has come under scrutiny following its endorsement of a charter to establish a parallel government in Sudan, signed by the paramilitary group Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The charter, which incited mixed reactions, received harsh criticism from Kenya’s significant trading partners, Qatar and Saudi Arabia, who voiced their disapproval through press statements over the weekend.
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia issued a strong condemnation of the charter, denouncing any actions taken outside Sudan’s official institutions that could undermine the nation’s unity and the will of its people. Saudi Arabia expressed its commitment to supporting Sudan’s security and stability, urging all parties involved in the conflict to revert to the Jeddah Declaration signed earlier in May 2023.
In parallel, Qatar’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed its disapproval of the initiative, emphasizing the importance of Sudan’s unity, independence, and sovereignty. Qatar called for prioritizing national interests and actively preventing the risk of division within the country. Additionally, the State of Qatar reiterated its support for an inclusive dialogue aimed at achieving lasting peace and stability in Sudan.
The charters signed in Nairobi by the RSF aim to establish governance in rebel-held territories, proposing a secular state alongside a unified national army. The document outlines the intention for Sudan to be a “secular, democratic, non-centralized state,” while also recognizing the right of armed groups to maintain their existence.
The dissent expressed by Qatar and Saudi Arabia against the RSF charter highlights the concerns surrounding Kenya’s foreign policy decisions and the potential repercussions on its diplomatic relations. Both nations advocate for a united Sudan, urging the return to previously established agreements to foster peace and stability. The outcome of these tensions emphasizes the delicate balance required in Sudan’s political landscape and the significance of regional support for its future stability.
Original Source: www.kenyans.co.ke
