Russia has proposed to mediate between Iran and the USA, emphasizing negotiation. The Trump administration is open to discussions, yet Iran insists on no pressure for negotiations. The situation is complicated by uncertainties in U.S. policies and Iran’s military advancements, particularly in naval capabilities, which could disrupt maritime trade.
In a recent analysis, Arman-e-Emrooz highlighted Russia’s proposal to mediate discussions between Iran and the United States. According to Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, Russia advocates for resolving issues through negotiations, expressing its readiness to assist in this dialogue. The Kremlin has agreed to facilitate communication on critical matters, such as Iran’s nuclear program.
The Trump administration has shown a willingness to negotiate with Iran, particularly concerning a verifiable nuclear agreement that promotes Iran’s peaceful development. However, Iran maintains its stance that negotiations will only occur without external pressure, especially under the current administration’s maximum pressure strategy.
Shargh emphasized the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s policy toward Iran. Senior analyst Pirouz Mousavi noted the ongoing challenges in the nuclear negotiations, which are exacerbated by an increase in enriched uranium and unresolved questions from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The dissonance between U.S. and European perspectives regarding international matters, including the war in Ukraine, adds to the complications facing Iranian negotiations.
Ettelaat featured an interview with international affairs expert Ali Bigdeli, who discussed the implications of Trump’s behavior toward Ukrainian President Zelensky. Bigdeli asserted that while both situations are complicated, equating Trump’s interactions with Zelensky to potential negotiations with Iran is misguided. He indicated that these discussions arise from a political faction relying on an ineffective strategy that eschews dialogue with the West.
Ham Mihan reported on Iran’s advancements in naval power, specifically focusing on the new Shahid Bagheri warship. Although it may not rival modern vessels technologically, the ship’s design reflects lessons learned from previous conflicts. The use of anti-ship missile technologies by Iranian allies, such as the Houthi militias, exemplifies the potential for significant disruption to maritime trade, with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps potentially amplifying this threat.
In summary, Russia’s interest in mediating between Iran and the United States signifies an ongoing need for dialogue regarding nuclear issues. However, uncertainties in U.S. policy under President Trump and Iran’s firm stance against negotiation under pressure complicate the situation. Simultaneously, Iran’s military developments raise concerns about maritime security, emphasizing the intricate dynamics of regional and international relations. Achieving a resolution necessitates diplomatic efforts amidst these challenges and evolving geopolitical landscapes.
Original Source: www.tehrantimes.com
