The Trump administration is set to expand its travel ban, potentially including Afghanistan alongside nations like Cuba, Iran, and North Korea. The proposed “red” list could re-implement restrictions from previous bans, alarming advocates for Afghan citizens who fear the consequences of a complete entry prohibition. An emergency statement has emphasized the urgency for Afghan visa holders abroad to return to the U.S. promptly.
The Trump administration is reportedly preparing to implement a new and expansive travel ban aimed at citizens of specific countries, significantly broader than previous iterations established during his first term. According to two anonymous officials, a draft proposal is being circulated that includes a “red” list of nations from which entry could be prohibited.
Currently, this proposed list largely mirrors the nations restricted in the previous travel bans, such as Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. Additionally, the administration is considering Afghans among those who would face a categorical ban on entering the United States, as noted by an official.
Shawn VanDiver, leader of a nonprofit organization assisting Afghan nationals who aided U.S. military efforts, indicated he has been informed that Afghan citizens would be subject to a complete travel ban. He stated that an emergency notice was disseminated, titled “Afghan Travel Ban coming,” urging all Afghans with valid visas currently outside the country to return immediately. Reports later confirmed Afghanistan’s addition to the proposed ban list.
The Trump administration is moving towards reinstating and broadening its travel ban policy, targeting several nations, including Afghanistan. The pending ban reflects a continuation of restrictions established during previous terms, emphasizing a focus on national security and immigration policy. Advocates for Afghan nationals have expressed urgent concerns regarding the implications of such a ban, highlighting the risks for those who supported U.S. forces.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
