This article discusses the escalating threat posed by Khalistani groups in the UK, highlighting Britain’s historical ties to anti-India groups and suggesting India should pause FTA negotiations as a means of asserting its diplomatic stance. It critiques the UK’s handling of these radical movements and calls for a policy of reciprocity in bilateral relations to ensure mutual respect and security.
In recent events, when Khalistani extremists compromised the security of India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, it highlighted Britain’s status as a refuge for anti-India groups. Though London may slightly manage these radical elements more effectively than Ottawa, the threat to India’s sovereignty remains significant.
Britain’s current plight can be traced to its inability to reconcile with the decline of its colonial empire. Following India’s independence in 1947, the former global power has struggled with its identity, transitioning from a vast empire to a mere nation-state. This decline has possibly cultivated lingering resentment towards India.
Additionally, Britain’s relationship with India is complicated by its historical ties to Pakistan. The British elites have long acted as champions for Pakistan’s interests, supporting its establishment. This circumstance reflects their preference for Pakistan over India due to ideological alignments and past political maneuvers, including those by figures like Jinnah and Churchill.
The rising influence of the Khalistani movement in Britain cannot be overlooked, particularly as political figures from both major parties express support for the cause. For example, British MP Preet Kaur Gill has previously advocated for Sikh self-determination and attended pro-Khalistan events, raising concerns about the political class’s complicity in fostering anti-India sentiment.
Violent actions by Khalistani groups have escalated, including an assault on the Indian High Commission and preventing access to an Indian envoy. Such incidents, framed by the UK as free expression, signal a failure of leadership to protect diplomatic relations and honor commitments.
The roots of the Khalistani movement, intertwined with Britain’s historical colonial policies, trace back to tactics used against nationalist movements in the early 20th century. The British colonial strategies have significantly contributed to the ongoing discord between Sikhs and Hindus, aiding the propagation of Khalistani ideology.
In response, India should take decisive actions, such as halting discussions on the India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) to underscore the seriousness of the issue. A reciprocal relationship should be established where both countries grant equal treatment concerning visas and diplomatic security, ensuring mutual respect and protection for political leaders and officials.
It is imperative for Britain to understand that its past status as a colonial power is no longer relevant. The time has come for a reassessment of its relationships, leading to a proactive stance that ceases to support colonial relics, thereby moving towards a more equitable diplomatic engagement with India.
In conclusion, the relationship between India and Britain necessitates a reevaluation based on mutual respect and reciprocity in diplomatic practices. India must reconsider its approach, particularly by halting the FTA talks, highlighting the urgency of addressing anti-India activities emerging from British soil. Ultimately, Britain must confront its historical affiliations and discontinue supporting groups that incite division and hostility.
Original Source: www.firstpost.com
