The Government of Guyana has received backlash for placing the “One Guyana” slogan on new passports. Critics, including Opposition MP Amanza Walton-Desir, argue this politicizes a national document and undermines democracy. They highlight the need for neutrality in state-issued materials and international standards set by ICAO. The situation reflects broader concerns about the merging of party politics with state identity.
The Government of Guyana faces substantial criticism from the Opposition and citizens regarding the incorporation of the political slogan “One Guyana” in the new passports. Amanza Walton-Desir, an Opposition Member of Parliament, condemned this decision, suggesting it signifies an encroachment towards a single-party state dictatorship. She argued that utilizing a political slogan on a national passport undermines its status as a sovereign document meant for all Guyanese, devoid of partisan bias.
Walton-Desir emphasized that the passport, as a state-issued document, should remain neutral, reflecting the nation’s diversity rather than a specific political agenda. She accused the Government of demonstrating a blatant disregard for democratic principles and institutional integrity by attaching political propaganda to a document held by all citizens, irrespective of political affiliation.
Furthermore, concerns were raised regarding the adherence to international standards established by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). Walton-Desir noted that ICAO’s Document 9303 provides guidelines that prohibit political messaging, emphasizing the necessity of neutrality and non-discriminatory practices in passport design.
This latest decision is not viewed as an isolated action; Walton-Desir pointed out similar instances where state resources have been leveraged for political branding, including law enforcement uniforms. She indicated that the current Government’s actions reflect a dangerous blend of party and state, suggesting a shift away from democratic norms.
Walton-Desir urged the international community to recognize these troubling developments, calling on citizens to remain vigilant and push back against such assaults on democratic integrity. She reflected on past criticisms made by the PPP regarding the previous Government’s use of party colors in state buildings, highlighting the inconsistency in their stance now that they are in power, reinforcing allegiance to party rather than national identity.
In summary, the incorporation of the “One Guyana” slogan on national passports by the Government of Guyana has drawn significant criticism from civic leaders and the Opposition. This action raises concerns about the potential erosion of democratic values and the integrity of state documents. Critics emphasize the need for neutrality and adherence to international standards in governmental practices, warning against the blurring of lines between party and state responsibilities. As this discourse unfolds, it remains crucial for citizens and international observers to remain engaged and advocate for transparency and democracy.
Original Source: newssourcegy.com
