The People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) has criticized IGAD’s recent statements regarding the peace process in South Sudan, claiming that the R-ARCSS framework is ineffective and exacerbates the country’s internal conflicts. PCCA argues for a new approach that focuses on inclusive political dialogue and the dismantling of privatized militias to ensure lasting peace and stability.
The People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) has expressed severe discontent regarding the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) and the recent summit addressing South Sudan’s situation. PCCA criticizes the summit’s statements, particularly the assertion that the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS) of 2018 is the cornerstone of peace, deeming such claims both inaccurate and detrimental to the quest for genuine peace.
The coalition argues that the R-ARCSS has not effectively fostered peace, citing ongoing violations and divisions within military ranks that continue to plague the country. They refute IGAD’s suggestion that the implementation of the agreement has significantly reduced conflict, pointing out that the ordinary civilians of South Sudan perceive the R-ARCSS as a mere facade that does not equate to peace and stability.
PCCA highlights that recent violence in Nasir illustrates growing frustration with the R-ARCSS, stressing a pattern of conflict affecting numerous regions. The coalition further elucidates that the government’s failures, compounded by inaction from IGAD and various regional bodies, are not being adequately addressed, demanding a more profound understanding of South Sudan’s issues.
The statement from PCCA critiques the new IGAD Ministerial-level sub-committee, asserting its vague mandate fails to confront the root causes of instability in South Sudan. Moreover, they argue for a genuine acknowledgment that the R-ARCSS is defunct and unsuitable for addressing the current political landscape. Their perspective vehemently seeks an overhaul in strategy, moving away from the ineffective framework of the R-ARCSS.
PCCA asserts that the future of South Sudan hinges not on adherence to the outdated R-ARCSS but rather on the establishment of an inclusive political dialogue that results in a constitutional agreement and conducive timelines for elections. They recommend dismantling existing militiamen power structures and forming a national army to stabilize the country effectively and promote lasting peace.
In conclusion, PCCA calls for an urgent reassessment of the political dynamics in South Sudan, advocating for the exit of entrenched political leaders and a revitalized commitment to genuine democratic practices. This proactive stance is essential to navigate the country away from potential disintegration and instability, ultimately ensuring peace within the region.
In summary, PCCA vehemently criticizes IGAD for its ineffective management of South Sudan’s crisis, arguing that the R-ARCSS has failed to create lasting peace or address the country’s internal conflicts. The coalition urges a shift from outdated frameworks to a focus on inclusive political dialogue that promotes genuine democracy and national cohesion. Without significant changes and acknowledgment of the real challenges facing South Sudan, the prospects for long-term stability remain bleak.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
