The U.S. and Israel are exploring resettlement options for Palestinians from Gaza, reaching out to Sudan, Somalia, and Somaliland. Trump’s plan involves relocating over 2 million people while the U.S. manages the territory. This initiative has faced widespread condemnation, with strong opposition from Palestinians and Arab nations.
In light of U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent proposals for postwar Gaza, the U.S. and Israel are reaching out to East African nations regarding the resettlement of Palestinians affected by the conflict. The nations contacted for potential resettlement include Sudan, Somalia, and the self-declared region of Somaliland. The initiative comes as part of a larger plan that seeks to permanently relocate over 2 million people from the Gaza Strip.
Under the proposed plan, the United States is expected to take control of Gaza, managing a significant cleanup operation while developing the land as a real estate project. U.S. and Israeli officials confirmed outreach to Somalia and Somaliland, while Sudanese officials acknowledged their rejection of the resettlement proposal.
This diplomatic activity began last month shortly after Trump introduced his Gaza plan alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel is reported to be spearheading these discussions despite the significant moral and legal controversies surrounding the mass relocation of Palestinians, which has previously been regarded as extreme even among Israeli nationalists.
Palestinian leaders have firmly rejected the plan, stating that any proposed departures would not truly be voluntary. Additionally, several Arab nations have raised strong objections to the potential uprooting of Palestinians from Gaza. The White House has declined to comment on these outreach efforts, as have the official offices of Netanyahu and Ron Dermer, indicating a lack of transparency regarding these developments.
In summary, the resettlement proposal for Palestinians from Gaza, initiated by the U.S. and Israel, has sparked significant international controversy and opposition. With engagements directed at Sudan, Somalia, and Somaliland, the plan reflects an ambitious and contentious approach to handling the aftermath of the Gaza conflict. The rejection by Sudan and the uncertainty expressed by Somalia and Somaliland underline the ongoing complexities and resistance to such an initiative.
Original Source: www.indiatvnews.com
