Former IRGC officers Javad and Arash, in an interview with Israeli media, criticized the Islamic Republic and expressed skepticism about the recovery of Hamas and Hezbollah. They discussed the impact of Israeli operations on Iran’s military strategy and the growing corruption within the regime, indicating significant internal dissent and a desire for change.
In a rare interview with Israeli media, several former Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) officers, including Javad and Arash, openly criticized the Islamic Republic and expressed doubt regarding the resurgence of Hamas and Hezbollah. Javad detailed his experiences as an IRGC operative, including his role in suppressing protests and insights into the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh, which he described as a “precise intelligence operation” revealing the extensive reach of Israeli intelligence within the IRGC.
Javad’s commentary highlights the significant repercussions of the Haniyeh assassination, followed by the killing of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and the collapse of Bashar Assad’s regime in Syria, which he characterized as a considerable loss for Iran. He indicated that Syria is now aligned with Israeli interests against Hezbollah, complicating the IRGC’s prospects: “The IRGC lost one of its strongest fronts in Syria.”
Expressing his disillusionment with the regime, Javad emphasized the pervasive corruption in Iran, stating, “Corruption in Iran has doubled. People are starting to wake up.” Furthermore, he recalled an instance of mockery towards Palestine among IRGC members, highlighting the growing internal dissent.
Arash, a former lieutenant colonel in the Iranian Air Force, elaborated on the tensions between the IRGC and the regular Iranian Army, the latter of which is reportedly increasingly discontented. He suggested that an attack on Iran might incite conflict between the two military factions, as some in the army await a chance to oppose the regime.
Both Javad and Arash supported Israeli military actions against the IRGC’s leadership, with Javad noting that Iranians reacted positively to strikes against Iran’s outdated military technology and expressing hope for a collaborative effort to reclaim their country. Arash advocated for a targeted strike on Ayatollah Khamenei’s residence as a catalyst for uprising against the regime. Their narratives reveal a growing schism within Iran’s military and a heightened urgency for change against the regime’s authority.
The interview with former IRGC officers Javad and Arash reveals significant dissent towards the Islamic Republic within Iran’s military ranks. Their accounts provide insight into the perceived failures of Hamas and Hezbollah, the internal discord between military factions, and a collective desire for change fueled by widespread corruption and strategic setbacks. As tensions rise, their testimonials suggest a profound yearning for reform among Iranian citizens, indicating a potentially transformative moment in Iran’s political landscape.
Original Source: www.jpost.com
