The article discusses the conflict between Tanzania’s opposition party ACT-Wazalendo and the ruling CCM over the blockage of Masoud Othman’s convoy in Angola. Othman accuses CCM leaders of misrepresentation, while those leaders defend their actions by emphasizing supposed procedural failures on Othman’s part. Calls for governmental transparency and discussions regarding the African Union leadership also arise, reflecting broader concerns about democracy in Africa.
In Tanzania, tensions have escalated between the opposition party ACT-Wazalendo and the ruling Chama cha Mapinduzi (CCM) due to the blockage of ACT-Wazalendo Chairman Masoud Othman’s convoy at Quatro de Fevereiro Airport in Angola. Othman accuses senior CCM officials, specifically Stephen Wasira and Hamis Mbetto, of misrepresenting the event to damage the Tanzanian government’s reputation. He calls for action against these leaders for their alleged misinformation.
Othman and his colleagues had traveled to Angola to engage in the African Democracy Forum (PAD) but faced an unexpected blockage. Following this, ACT-Wazalendo issued a statement condemning the act and urged the Tanzanian government to issue a public denunciation. In a response, Wasira emphasized that the situation at the airport was out of the Tanzanian government’s control, suggesting that Angolan authorities likely had their reasons for the blockade.
Mbetto further argued that Othman and his delegation failed to comply with proper travel protocols, contributing to the blockage. He defended his actions, asserting that he had not wronged anyone and recommended that Othman consider why his convoy faced issues while others did not.
In response, Othman affirmed that his delegation followed all necessary travel protocols, obtaining approval from the President of Zanzibar and notifying relevant authorities. He contended that the fault for the incident lay with Angolan officials, expressing disbelief that the Tanzanian government would wish to obstruct events in Angola.
Mbetto maintained that there was no basis for accountability in this case, suggesting Othman should demonstrate a higher level of political tolerance. He highlighted that past leaders had traveled without incident, insinuating that the failure of Othman’s delegation to do so was due to their own negligence.
Dorothy Semu of ACT-Wazalendo voiced the need for government transparency regarding the blockage, calling for the Tanzanian Ambassador to Angola to be summoned for clarification. Semu also raised concerns over the leadership efficacy of the President of Angola in his role as Chair of the African Union, arguing it could hinder democracy efforts.
The PAD Forum, focused on democracy in Africa, recently convened in Angola; previous meetings were held in Poland and South Africa, emphasizing the importance of political discussions for Africa’s future.
The ongoing dispute between ACT-Wazalendo and CCM exemplifies the complexities of Tanzanian politics, highlighting significant tensions regarding accountability and governance. Despite claims of protocol neglect by Othman’s delegation, accusations of misinformation linger, further complicating the political landscape. It is vital for the Tanzanian government to provide clarity regarding such incidents to uphold transparency and public trust. The situation raises concerns about the current leadership role of Angola within the African Union and its implications for democratic practices.
Original Source: www.thecitizen.co.tz
