The Trump administration is proposing a new travel ban affecting citizens from 43 countries, with a draft categorizing them into “red” and “orange” tiers. The “red” list includes 11 countries barred completely, while the “orange” list restricts travel with exceptions for affluent business travelers. Internal evaluations are ongoing, suggesting likely revisions before finalization.
The Trump administration is contemplating a significant travel ban that could impact citizens from up to 43 countries. According to insiders, the proposed restrictions would surpass those established during the former president’s initial term. A draft circulated among diplomatic and security officials categorizes these nations into tiers, creating a structured approach to the possible bans.
Specifically, the draft identifies an unequivocal “red” list comprising 11 nations whose citizens would entirely be prohibited from entering the United States. This list includes Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. The formulation of this list has prompted discussions within the State Department, and officials emphasize that this is a preliminary draft likely subject to modifications before reaching the White House.
In addition to the red list, there exists an “orange” list featuring 10 countries slated for restricted travel, where affluent business travelers might still enter but individuals with immigrant or tourist visas would face barring. Officials across various departments and intelligence services are presently scrutinizing the draft for factual accuracy and potential policy implications that might influence the final decisions.
In summary, the Trump administration is moving towards implementing a new travel ban that could restrict entry for citizens of 43 nations. The proposal categorizes countries into “red” and “orange” tiers, with severe restrictions for the former. Internal evaluations and revisions are ongoing, indicating that the draft may evolve significantly prior to its potential enactment.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
