President Bola Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers State, suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara amid security concerns following an explosion at the Trans-Niger Pipeline. This decision, allowing federal intervention, is criticized as a power grab by opponents. The Nigerian Bar Association calls it unconstitutional, while the PDP challenges Fubara’s dismissal.
In a decisive response to escalating violence and unrest, President Bola Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Nigeria’s Rivers State on Tuesday. This action resulted in the suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara and local legislators for a period of six months, appointing former navy chief Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas as the caretaker governor. The declaration permits the federal government to implement regulations and deploy security forces to ensure stability in the region.
The declaration follows a concerning incident involving an explosion at the Trans-Niger Pipeline, which has disrupted daily crude oil production valued at $14 million. Although investigations are underway, President Tinubu accused Governor Fubara of inadequately addressing the activities of gangs responsible for previous attacks, linked to oil theft and illegal sales on the black market.
Critics of President Tinubu assert that his true motive for the emergency declaration is to exert control over the oil-rich Rivers State, particularly since Governor Fubara is a member of the People’s Democratic Party, which opposes Tinubu’s All Progressives Congress. Furthermore, Fubara has been involved in ongoing disputes with his predecessor, Ezenwo Nyesom Wike, and faced threats of impeachment from political rivals.
The Nigerian Bar Association has condemned Tinubu’s actions as “unconstitutional.” Meanwhile, the People’s Democratic Party continues to challenge the legitimacy of the state of emergency, asserting that Fubara remains the rightful governor, and it has urged the National Assembly to reverse Tinubu’s decision.
In summary, President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State has stirred significant controversy, with implications for political power dynamics and regional stability. The move, catalyzed by violence targeting oil infrastructure, raises questions about intentions and constitutional authority. As the situation develops, reactions from political groups and legal bodies will be instrumental in shaping future governance in Rivers State.
Original Source: www.gzeromedia.com
