The Trump administration is drafting a new travel ban potentially affecting 43 countries, with a “red” list of 11 countries faced with total entry bans and an “orange” list indicating restricted travel, primarily for affluent individuals. The proposal is still being analyzed and may undergo changes before finalization.
The Trump administration is considering a new travel ban affecting citizens from up to 43 countries, surpassing the restrictions of his initial term. A draft list crafted by diplomatic and security officials highlights a three-tier classification of countries, indicating potential travel restrictions to the United States.
The highest priority, termed the “red” list, comprises 11 countries whose citizens would be completely barred from entry. These are Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen.
The draft, developed by the State Department weeks ago, is subject to modifications before final approval. Officials from various departments and intelligence agencies are evaluating the accuracy of the assessments related to each country and deliberating possible exceptions based on geopolitical considerations.
Additionally, an “orange” list of 10 countries is proposed, where travel would be restricted but not entirely prohibited. In these instances, affluent business travelers may still gain entry, while individuals on immigrant or tourist visas might face barriers.
This travel ban proposal reflects ongoing security and diplomatic assessments and indicates the administration’s shift in policy towards immigration restrictions, with significant implications for international travel.
In summary, the Trump administration is contemplating a significant travel ban affecting 43 countries, categorized into tiers based on entry restrictions. The “red” list includes 11 countries facing total entry bans, while the “orange” list proposes restricted travel primarily for affluent individuals. The details of this draft are still subject to change as security and diplomatic assessments continue to unfold, highlighting an evolving stance on immigration policy.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
