The Trump administration is proposing a new travel ban that could restrict entry from 43 countries, featuring a strict “red” list of 11 nations with complete bans and an “orange” list with limited access for affluent travelers.
The Trump administration is considering a broader travel ban targeting citizens from up to 43 countries. According to officials familiar with the discussions, this new ban would expand upon the restrictions imposed during President Trump’s first term. A draft list, developed by diplomatic and security officials, categorizes these countries into three tiers, including a strict ban for certain countries.
The proposed “red” list identifies 11 countries whose citizens would be completely barred from entering the United States. These countries include Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. Officials noted that this list was recently drafted by the State Department and is subject to change before final approval is granted by the White House.
Embassy officials and security specialists from various governmental departments are currently reviewing the draft for accuracy in the descriptions of deficiencies in the listed countries. They are also evaluating whether there are legitimate policy considerations that could necessitate the exclusion of certain nations from the travel ban.
Additionally, the draft includes an “orange” list of 10 countries, which would impose travel restrictions without a complete ban. In this case, affluent business travelers may be permitted entry, while those on immigrant or tourist visas would be denied access.
The potential new travel ban proposed by the Trump administration aims to restrict entry from up to 43 countries. The drafting process is ongoing, with a definitive list subject to modifications based on feedback from various government officials. The strategy includes both a complete ban for certain nations and limited access under special circumstances for others, emphasizing the administration’s evolving stance on national security and immigration policy.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
