Following President Bola Tinubu’s state of emergency in Rivers State, experts express concerns about legality and implications for democracy. The federal action mirrors criticisms previously aimed at military juntas in Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso. Local grievances, particularly among the Ijaw, compound feelings of marginalization, threatening economic recovery and foreign investment amid political instability.
The current atmosphere in Nigeria is fraught with tension following President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. This decision, which resulted in the suspension of Governor Sim Fubara and the legislature, raises concerns whether Nigeria is mimicking the actions witnessed in Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso. Critics are questioning the legality of removing a democratically elected government and calling for political resolutions rather than military interventions.
Legal professionals, particularly the Nigerian Bar Association, have condemned the president’s actions, viewing them as illegal and undemocratic. The federal government’s choice to temporarily replace Governor Fubara with retired Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas has prompted discussions about Nigeria’s commitment to democratic governance. There is a prevalent belief that internal disputes should be resolved through political discussions rather than military means, reminiscent of the previously criticized juntas in neighboring countries.
Last year, Nigeria strongly denounced the military takeovers in Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso, insisting on a return to democratic governance. Yet, these nations have argued that their current governments are more responsive to the desires of their populations, having curtailed the influence of foreign entities exploiting their resources for profit at the expense of local welfare.
This reality frames the paradox of Nigeria’s actions; while condemning militarized governance abroad, internal measures mirror such behaviors, rejecting the notion of restoring democratic order. Observers express concern that this state of emergency may lead to further instability and disillusionment among the Nigerian population, threatening economic recovery and foreign investment in the oil-rich region of Rivers State.
Critics argue the declaration, which lacks substantial governance mechanisms, renders a clear message of political instability rather than the intended peace. The new administrator’s capacity to enforce order independently is questioned, and there is widespread fear of an impending governance void. Many analysts believe the precarious approach may worsen existing tensions, risking a return to conditions that favor civil unrest and criminal activities, particularly against oil facilities, a vital economic asset.
The sentiment among Ijaw leaders reflects a deeper historical grievance over political marginalization. Despite being resource-rich, the Ijaw community has only briefly held the governorship since 1999, which can lead to increased resentment and unrest. Additionally, recent court rulings regarding fiscal allocations further compound the feeling of exclusion and economic disenfranchisement among local populations.
As political and economic landscapes in Nigeria threaten to spiral downward, investors are already wary of the unfolding chaos, which adds to a long-standing struggle with oil theft and production losses. Given the timing of President Tinubu’s moves amidst international investment efforts, the domestic turmoil creates an unfavorable setting for sustainable economic growth. Such political instability directly undermines efforts to create jobs and attract investments, pushing Nigeria into a precarious situation.
In summary, the situation in Rivers State is reflective of broader political tensions within Nigeria, highlighting a troubling shift toward militarized governance under the guise of addressing local disputes. The legal and public backlash against such measures questions Nigeria’s commitment to democratic processes and may inhibit foreign investment—a crucial component for economic recovery. Unresolved grievances among marginalized communities, especially the Ijaw, coupled with the hostile investment climate, paints a bleak picture for Nigeria’s future stability. Therefore, it is imperative for the government to pursue peaceful political engagement to foster a conducive environment for economic growth and restore public trust.
Original Source: businessday.ng
