Jordan Goudreau, a former Green Beret, has accused the CIA and FBI of sabotaging his 2020 plot to invade Venezuela and overthrow Maduro. Goudreau insists he had authorization from the Trump administration, but U.S. officials have denied any support. He faces legal challenges related to weapon smuggling as he maintains hope for a reprieve under the new administration.
A former Green Beret, Jordan Goudreau, has publicly accused the CIA and FBI of undermining his 2020 attempt to invade Venezuela and oust President Nicolás Maduro. Goudreau, who is now facing weapons smuggling charges in federal court, claimed in a social media video that he had received authorization from high-level officials in the Trump administration for the failed operation. Despite his assertions, U.S. authorities have denied any involvement or approval of the planned incursion, which resulted in the capture of several combatants and brought ridicule upon Goudreau’s mission, labeled “Operation Gideon”. As legal proceedings advance, Goudreau continues to insist he received support from significant political figures, while the federal government maintains a firm disavowal of the operation.
The 2020 failed attempt to overthrow Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela has drawn a mix of controversy and scrutiny, particularly concerning the involvement of its U.S.-based orchestrators. Jordan Goudreau, a decorated veteran, claimed that his operation had backing from the Trump administration, despite evidence collected by media investigations that suggest otherwise. This predicament has been further complicated by Goudreau’s arrest on weapon smuggling charges and ongoing debates over U.S. foreign policy toward Venezuela during the previous administration. The proceedings highlight complexities over covert operations and the implications of geopolitical maneuvers on national and international fronts.
Jordan Goudreau’s claims of U.S. support for his failed operation to overthrow Maduro in Venezuela paint a contentious picture of secretive engagements between private citizens and governmental actors. While he insists on having had authorization for his actions, legal challenges loom as federal authorities remain firm in denying any involvement. His situation encapsulates the intricacies of U.S. foreign policy and the often precarious nature of private involvement in military interventions.
Original Source: apnews.com
