Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi stated that the situation along the India-China border is stable but sensitive, rejecting the concept of buffer zones along the Line of Actual Control. He highlighted successful verification patrols and mutual agreements on grazing areas. Ongoing diplomatic efforts aim to rebuild trust between the two countries following their disengagement in eastern Ladakh.
During a recent press conference, Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi addressed the evolving situation along the India-China border, emphasizing that the area remains “stable but sensitive.” He clarified that there are no designated “buffer zones” along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), although negotiations have led to temporary agreements to maintain distance in key areas to prevent escalation of tensions. Furthermore, General Dwivedi mentioned that verification patrols had been completed satisfactorily by both sides, and mutual agreements regarding grazing areas have been reached. He expressed the need for a renewed approach to trust-building measures between the two nations, looking forward to upcoming discussions between special representatives.
The India-China border dispute has been a longstanding issue, particularly in regions such as Ladakh. Following significant confrontations since May 2020, both nations engaged in disengagement talks to withdraw troops from critical areas. The April 2029 timeline marks a significant point in negotiations, indicating an attempt to stabilize the relationship and reduce tensions along the contested border. The recent remarks by the Army Chief shed light on ongoing diplomatic efforts and military stances regarding stability in the region.
In summary, General Upendra Dwivedi’s statements underscore India’s commitment to maintaining a stable and sensitive border situation with China while ruling out the establishment of buffer zones. As both nations have completed disengagement at significant points in Ladakh, the focus has shifted towards rebuilding trust and ensuring peace through continued dialogue and mutual agreements. Future discussions between special representatives may provide further avenues for resolution and cooperation.
Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com
