Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani is set to meet with Shiite Coordination Framework leaders to discuss amendments to the PMF Law, focusing on retaining senior commanders and establishing a clear authority structure. The amendments aim to secure the PMF’s independence from political interference while enhancing member rights. Disputes over this law have contributed to political stalemates in parliament, necessitating innovative legislative solutions.
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani plans to convene with leaders from the Shiite Coordination Framework to deliberate proposed amendments to the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) Service and Retirement Law. A member of the Framework disclosed that the focus of the meeting is to revise significant provisions that include retaining senior PMF commanders, protecting members’ rights, and establishing clear criteria for ranks and leadership roles.
The forthcoming amendments aspire to reconfigure the PMF as a security force subject solely to the prime minister’s authority, thereby insulating it from political interference in military endeavors. An official elaborated, “The goal is to ensure the PMF remains a professional security force, independent of political manoeuvring, while safeguarding the rights of its fighters.”
A senior figure from the Coordination Framework emphasized that these amendments are critical for the PMF’s future and its stabilizing function in Iraq. He stated, “We want to ensure the PMF operates under clear, unified leadership without external pressures.”
Political disagreements surrounding the PMF law have intensified divisions, resulting in a stalemate within Iraq’s parliament. This impasse has prompted lawmakers to boycott numerous sessions, thereby hindering quorum and delaying vital legislative actions. To alleviate these tensions, Prime Minister Al-Sudani has decided to retract the PMF law from parliamentary discussions.
As a solution, the Coordination Framework is considering the possibility of including the PMF law within a broader legislative agenda. Support from Kurdish parties is contingent upon the ratification of laws pertaining to Halabja, oil, and gas, while Sunni factions require the passage of de-Baathification legislation as a condition for their backing.
Significant controversies concerning the PMF law include the implications of political influence, particularly regarding Iran’s involvement, which raises concerns about Iraq’s sovereignty. Additionally, the PMF’s political involvement is debated due to its potential to compromise the impartiality of state institutions. Opinions are divided regarding whether the PMF should be integrated into the Iraqi armed forces or maintain independence, with some advocating for its merger.
Furthermore, discussions are centered on the extent of government oversight required for the PMF, with suggestions ranging from increased supervision to maintaining its autonomy. Financially, there are calls for enhanced government funding, while some propose exploring alternative financing avenues. Lastly, there is contention regarding PMF salaries, with some advocating for parity with the Iraqi army’s pay, while others argue for maintaining a lower wage scale.
The discussions surrounding the PMF Law are critical for defining the future role of the PMF within Iraq. Proposed amendments aim to enhance the independence and professionalism of the PMF while addressing the financial and operational aspects of this security force. Political dynamics and external influences also play a significant role in shaping the legislation. Ultimately, reaching consensus on these matters is essential for the stability of Iraq’s political landscape and the effective functioning of its security forces.
Original Source: shafaq.com
