The Trump administration is proposing a travel ban impacting citizens of 43 countries, more extensive than previous restrictions. A draft lists 11 countries for strict entry prohibition and 10 for limited access, pending further review by officials.
The Trump administration is contemplating a new travel ban that could affect citizens of up to 43 countries, according to officials with knowledge of the situation. This draft proposes a tiered structure for restrictions, which may prove more extensive than previous limitations enacted during President Trump’s first term.
A preliminary list comprising recommendations from diplomatic and security officials includes a “red” list of 11 countries whose citizens would be entirely prohibited from entering the United States. The countries identified are Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen.
It is important to note that the details of this draft were created by the State Department several weeks ago, and the final list may undergo modifications before being presented to the White House. Officials from various embassies, regional bureaus, and intelligence agencies have been evaluating the draft to ensure the accuracy of the descriptions used for each nation and considering implications related to international cooperation that might dictate changes.
The proposal also outlines an “orange” list consisting of 10 countries where travel would be restricted yet not entirely banned. In this category, affluent business travelers may gain entry, whereas those seeking to enter on immigrant or tourist visas would be denied access.
In summary, the planned travel ban by the Trump administration is set to expand significantly, potentially impacting citizens from 43 nations. The draft includes a strict prohibition list and a more lenient restriction list, pending further assessment and potential alterations. The ongoing review by various government officials will be crucial in determining the final structure of these travel regulations.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
